I am opposed to 5 game and no-advantage system.
However, it is not the viewpoint to see but the viewpoint to play.
This no-advantage rule had spread rapidly at civil tournament in the past several years.
A lucky element becomes high extremely in case of the rule decided by no-advantage at one shot.
Although surely a merit difference is shortened and also carries out mind delightful as a convention management side, he has a feeling that pleasant diplomacy is hurt.
I think that it is after really interesting one becomes Duce in a game.
If it is a server, it is devoted in 1 flat or it puts in steadily by course serious consideration.. If it is a return, it is the scene variously considered to be .. quickly that there may be a dash.
It stops being able to carry out gamble in a serve as it is a no-advantage one-shot deal.
Since a game will also be lost if a double fault is carried out in 2nd serve, it does not go and spread from 1st by safe serve inevitably.
It is that it is 5 game match that there is such a demerit in no-advantage rule!
In case of doubles, a serve is turned to four games one and suits them.
A possibility of becoming a game end only by turning one's one serve will become high.